POOR AFRICAN FARMERS DO BETTER THAN WEALTHIER COUNTERPARTS IF THEY FARM A GREATER VARIETY OF FOODS
Limited access to land, workers, or farm chemicals can be offset by diversification, study shows
Poor farmers can achieve similar or higher incomes than farmers with greater access to resources if they farm a wider variety of crops and livestock, according to a study of more than 1,000 African farmers.
The same is also true for their food security, and the authors say it indicates a strong potential for diversification as a means to improve livelihoods amongst the continent’s smallholders.
Dr Chloe MacLaren, who led the joint Rothamsted – International Institute of Tropical Agriculture study, said: “These findings question the widespread assumption that low-resourced smallholder farming systems are inherently inefficient and that ‘Green Revolution’ technologies, such as crop breeding and agrochemical inputs, are necessarily the best route to improving agricultural production and rural livelihoods.”
Farming systems intensified via increasing crop and livestock richness, in combination with diverse home gardens and agroforestry, could, she said, offer substantial improvements to food security and nutrition.
The study found that, in general, farms with access to greater resources - in terms of land, inputs, and incomes - did better than those with access to few resources.
However, farms raising the greatest variety of plants and animals could achieve similar, or sometimes greater levels of food security, dietary diversity, and incomes as better resourced but less diverse farms.
It remains to be proven whether greater farm diversity directly leads to greater incomes and food security, or whether some other underlying factor leads to both more diverse farms and to better outcomes.
However, says Dr MacLaren, the study was careful to separate the effects of wealth from the effects of diversity on farm outcomes, and also found no evidence for geographical associations that would indicate an effect of variables such as rainfall or elevation.
Dr MacLaren said: “Food security and livelihoods among smallholder farmers in sub-Saharan Africa are often constrained by not being able to afford workers or livestock, and it can be difficult to break through barriers such as low land availability and the unaffordability of agricultural chemicals.
“We wondered whether such farmers could gain a better return on their limited resources by optimizing the composition and/or diversity of crop and livestock species they raise. Our results are a strong sign that this approach is worthy of further investigation.”
Surveying 1,133 households in Kenya and Nigeria, the researchers looked at the total resources available to a household; which crops, livestock, fruit or vegetables were raised; and the proportion of each type of produce.
Maize is a staple crop in the areas studied, which also have similar population and livestock densities.
In each village one each of a small, medium and large farm were surveyed, with questions related to agricultural production, as well as the diet and wealth of each household.
She added the reason why diversified farms fared better wasn’t yet clear, but it could be because a greater variety of farmed products increases productivity through weed, pest and disease suppression.
There were some exceptions to this trend that requires further investigation - increasing species richness was not beneficial for low-resourced, livestock-focused farmers in western Kenya, for instance.
And in northern Nigeria, where farmers with more diverse smallholdings purchased a lower variety of foods, which lead to less diverse diets.
The study is published in the journal Frontiers in Sustainable Food Systems.
About Rothamsted Research
Rothamsted Research is the longest-running agricultural research institute in the world. We work from gene to field with a proud history of ground-breaking discoveries, from crop treatment to crop protection, from statistical interpretation to soils management. Our founders, in 1843, were the pioneers of modern agriculture, and we are known for our imaginative science and our collaborative influence on fresh thinking and farming practices.
Through independent science and innovation, we make significant contributions to improving agri-food systems in the UK and internationally. In terms of the institute’s economic contribution, the cumulative impact of our work in the UK was calculated to exceed £3000 million a year in 20151. Our strength lies in our systems approach, which combines science and strategic research, interdisciplinary teams and partnerships.
Rothamsted is also home to three unique resources. These National Capabilities are open to researchers from all over the world: The Long-Term Experiments, Rothamsted Insect Survey and the North Wyke Farm Platform.
We are strategically funded by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC), with additional support from other national and international funding streams, and from industry. We are also supported by the Lawes Agricultural Trust (LAT).
For more information, visit https://www.rothamsted.ac.uk/; Twitter @Rothamsted
1Rothamsted Research and the Value of Excellence: A synthesis of the available evidence, by Séan Rickard (Oct 2015)
The Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council is part of UK Research and Innovation, a non-departmental public body funded by a grant-in-aid from the UK government.
BBSRC invests in world-class bioscience research and training on behalf of the UK public. Our aim is to further scientific knowledge, to promote economic growth, wealth and job creation and to improve quality of life in the UK and beyond.
Funded by government, BBSRC invested £469 million in world-class bioscience in 2016-17. We support research and training in universities and strategically funded institutes. BBSRC research and the people we fund are helping society to meet major challenges, including food security, green energy and healthier, longer lives. Our investments underpin important UK economic sectors, such as farming, food, industrial biotechnology and pharmaceuticals.
More information about BBSRC, our science and our impact.
More information about BBSRC strategically funded institutes
The Lawes Agricultural Trust, established in 1889 by Sir John Bennet Lawes, supports Rothamsted Research’s national and international agricultural science through the provision of land, facilities and funding. LAT, a charitable trust, owns the estates at Harpenden and Broom's Barn, including many of the buildings used by Rothamsted Research. LAT provides an annual research grant to the Director, accommodation for nearly 200 people, and support for fellowships for young scientists from developing countries. LAT also makes capital grants to help modernise facilities at Rothamsted, or invests in new buildings.