INCREASED WATER POLLUTION FROM FARMS WILL BECOME COMMON UNDER CLIMATE CHANGE
Very wet winter made polluted river more than twenty times worse
A study of river water quality during one of the UK’s wettest ever winters shows a massive increase in agricultural pollution occurred, giving a glimpse of what is to come under future climate change.
Pollutants washing from farmland within the upper catchment of Devon’s River Taw increased dramatically during the winter of 2019/20, with the amount of soil washed off arable fields – and the associated environmental clean-up costs - showing a twenty-fold increase on average.
Large pulses of such sediment pollution harm both aquatic wildlife and drinking water quality, and the study’s climate modelling predicts the weather pattern responsible will be more common in the future.
The report by Rothamsted Research also shows levels of nitrate, another major aquatic pollutant arising from fertiliser use, increased by four times during the wet winter from recently converted arable land.
Meanwhile, the sediment lost from grazed grassland areas roughly doubled, with nitrate runoff increasing by about half.
Hydrologist Professor Adie Collins, who leads Rothamsted’s research in this area said: “These changes in autumn and winter rainfall are elevating runoff and the water pollution problems arising from modern farming. Sadly, current on-farm mitigation strategies, including those subsidised by agri-environment schemes, aren’t working very well.”
February 2020 was the wettest February on record for the UK, with the meteorological winter - December, January, February - ranked as the 5th wettest on record since 1862.
The researchers produced climate predictions for their study site, which suggest this sort of weather pattern will become more common in the future - with the most extreme rain days occurring even more often than they did in February 2020.
Alongside the impact on wildlife, water pollutant emissions affect the provision of valuable ‘ecosystem services’ to humans, said Professor Collins, and these impacts were assessed using the concept of ‘environmental damage’ costs.
For sediment loss from fields, environmental damage costs were calculated to be at most £8 per hectare during 2016–2019.
During the wet 2019/20 winter, average costs increased three-fold for existing grassland fields - but by more than 20-fold, to about £100 per hectare, for fields recently converted to arable production.
“Pollution from intensive farming generates environmental damage with resultant costs such as those for drinking water treatment to remove nutrients and sediment,” said Professor Collins. “Elevated pollution driven by extreme wet-weather increases such problems considerably.”
The data for the research were collected by specialist equipment monitoring the water coming from four fields on a farm and three other nearby sites within the upper reaches of the River Taw catchment in Devon, as well as readings from a Met Office station based on the farm.
The River Taw rises in the uplands of Dartmoor, whilst the study sites were in lowland areas, close to Okehampton.
Rothamsted’s North Wyke site is the world’s ‘most instrumented farm’, where all the key inputs and outputs of the site are measured, as well as detailed analyses on soil, air, water and livestock samples.
Millions of measurements of rainfall, flow and water chemistry were collected every 15-minutes for the study throughout a four-year period using state-of-the-art sensors.
The research farm has traditionally been livestock only, but several fields were recently converted to arable to see what would happen as we shift away from meat eating to predominantly plant-based diets on soils classified as not being highly suitable for crop production.
The data show how arable farmland can be a much greater contributor to water pollution than lowland grazing livestock, revealing its lack of resistance to wet-weather.
As for the future, climate modelling for this site suggests winter 19/20 is a good example of what to expect over the coming decades, said Professor Collins.
“Compared to the period 1981 to 2010, the 19/20 winter had nearly 20% more rainfall, with about 209 mm falling in February 2020 – which is more than 133% more than the climatic baseline.”
This was the third highest monthly rainfall on record since 1982.
October 2019–March 2020 was most characteristic of predicted future climates with respect to days with more than 1 mm rainfall, says Professor Collins, and it was this weather pattern that was most associated with sediment – but not nitrate – loss.
“The elevated sediment losses are therefore a good insight into what we might expect in future climates,” he said.
The research is published in the Journal of Cleaner Production.
About Rothamsted Research
Rothamsted Research is the longest-running agricultural research institute in the world. We work from gene to field with a proud history of ground-breaking discoveries, from crop treatment to crop protection, from statistical interpretation to soils management. Our founders, in 1843, were the pioneers of modern agriculture, and we are known for our imaginative science and our collaborative influence on fresh thinking and farming practices.
Through independent science and innovation, we make significant contributions to improving agri-food systems in the UK and internationally. In terms of the institute’s economic contribution, the cumulative impact of our work in the UK was calculated to exceed £3000 million a year in 20151. Our strength lies in our systems approach, which combines science and strategic research, interdisciplinary teams and partnerships.
Rothamsted is also home to three unique resources. These National Capabilities are open to researchers from all over the world: The Long-Term Experiments, Rothamsted Insect Survey and the North Wyke Farm Platform.
We are strategically funded by the Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC), with additional support from other national and international funding streams, and from industry. We are also supported by the Lawes Agricultural Trust (LAT).
For more information, visit https://www.rothamsted.ac.uk/; Twitter @Rothamsted
1Rothamsted Research and the Value of Excellence: A synthesis of the available evidence, by Séan Rickard (Oct 2015)
The Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council is part of UK Research and Innovation, a non-departmental public body funded by a grant-in-aid from the UK government.
BBSRC invests in world-class bioscience research and training on behalf of the UK public. Our aim is to further scientific knowledge, to promote economic growth, wealth and job creation and to improve quality of life in the UK and beyond.
Funded by government, BBSRC invested £469 million in world-class bioscience in 2016-17. We support research and training in universities and strategically funded institutes. BBSRC research and the people we fund are helping society to meet major challenges, including food security, green energy and healthier, longer lives. Our investments underpin important UK economic sectors, such as farming, food, industrial biotechnology and pharmaceuticals.
More information about BBSRC, our science and our impact.
More information about BBSRC strategically funded institutes
The Lawes Agricultural Trust, established in 1889 by Sir John Bennet Lawes, supports Rothamsted Research’s national and international agricultural science through the provision of land, facilities and funding. LAT, a charitable trust, owns the estates at Harpenden and Broom's Barn, including many of the buildings used by Rothamsted Research. LAT provides an annual research grant to the Director, accommodation for nearly 200 people, and support for fellowships for young scientists from developing countries. LAT also makes capital grants to help modernise facilities at Rothamsted, or invests in new buildings.